Discipline • 6 min • Feb 10, 2026

How to Review Trades Effectively – The 5 Questions That Actually Improve Your Trading

Most traders journal but do not review. This review framework extracts data gold from every trade.

Back to Blog Explore Platform

Key Takeaways

  • Ask the right 5 questions to extract maximum learning from each trade
  • Identify personal patterns: setup types you are bad at, emotional triggers
  • Find A-rated trades (perfect execution) vs. B/C-rated (learning opportunities)
  • Build a personal edge database from your journal

The 5 Trade Review Questions

1. "Did this setup match my written trading plan?" (Binary: Yes/No)

If no = you deviated. Write down why. Deviation = -30% edge.

2. "Was my position size correct for this stop loss?" (Calculate on the spot)

If no = risk management error, not strategy error. Fix this.

3. "What was my emotional state before entry?" (Calm, Frustrated, Angry, Fearful)

Pattern: Frustrated entries have 30% lower win rate. Angry entries lose money 90% of the time.

4. "What did this trade teach me?" (Specific lesson, not generic)

Bad: "I need to be disciplined." Good: "FVGs in low-volatility markets have 40% fill rate. Skip them during Asian session."

5. "Rate this trade execution A-B-C." (A = Perfect, B = Good, C = Poor)

Track: Your A-rated trades average X% wins. Your C-rated trades average Y%. This data is gold.

Spend 3 minutes per trade on these questions. After 50 trades, you have data. After 100 trades, you have certainty.

Building Your Edge Database

After 50 trades, you can identify which setup types have the highest win rate FOR YOU.

Example findings from your review data:

• "My BOS + FVG + liquidity setups: 68% win rate, 1:2.5 R:R = +$200 per trade over 25 trades"

• "My lone BOS setups (no FVG): 45% win rate, 1:1 R:R = +$0 per trade over 20 trades"

• "My entries during London 08:00-12:00 window: 65% win. Entries after 15:00: 40% win."

• "Trades after 2 consecutive losses: 35% win. Trades after 2 consecutive wins: 62% win."

This is the data that defines YOUR edge. This is why journaling matters. Without it, you are flying blind.

FAQ

What are the 5 essential trade review questions?

(1) Did setup match written plan? (Yes/No - deviation = -30% edge). (2) Was position size correct for stop loss? (Risk management check). (3) What was emotional state before entry? (Frustrated entries = 30% lower win rate). (4) What did this trade teach me? (Specific lesson, not generic). (5) Rate execution A-B-C (A = perfect, C = poor). 3 minutes per trade, data gold after 100 trades.

How do I identify my personal edge from trade reviews?

After 50-100 trades, categorize by: setup type (BOS, FVG, liquidity), session (London, NY, Asia), emotional state (calm, frustrated), execution grade (A-B-C). Calculate win rate % for each category. Example: A-rated trades 70% win rate, C-rated 35%. BOS+FVG in London when calm = your highest edge. Focus 80% trading on that setup next month.

What is the difference between setup error and execution error?

Setup error = wrong trade (does not match plan, low R:R, counter-trend). Fix: skip that setup type next time. Execution error = right setup, wrong entry timing/size/stop placement. Fix: improve pre-trade checklist compliance. Example: Trading BOS without CHoCH = setup error. Trading BOS+CHoCH but entering too early = execution error. Different fixes.

How often should I review my trades?

Daily: Quick 2-minute journal entry per trade. Weekly: 30-minute review of all trades, identify top 2 mistakes. Monthly: 1-hour deep dive, calculate win rate by setup/session/emotion, adjust plan based on data. Review frequency matters more than review length. Consistent weekly reviews beat occasional 3-hour marathons.

What should I write in "What did this trade teach me"?

Specific, actionable lesson. Bad: "I need discipline" (generic). Good: "FVGs in low-volatility Asia session have 40% fill rate. Skip them. Only trade FVGs during London/NY." Or "Frustrated entries within 30 min of loss have 35% win rate. Implement 60-min cooldown rule." Specific lessons create specific rules. Generic thoughts create nothing.